- definition
of Semantics
If
not most, at least, many introductions to semantics begin by asking the following
question: what is semantics? What does semantics actually study? This seems like
a sensible way to start a course on semantics, so we can begin by looking at some
of the answers that different authors provide. According to Lyons (1977), Semantics
is the study of meaning. Semantics is the study of meaning in language Hurford
& Heasley The (1983). Semantics is the study of meaning communicated
through language Saeed (2003). Semantics is the part of linguistics that is
concerned with meaning Löbner (2002). Linguistic semantics is the study of how
languages organize and express meanings (Kreidler, 1998). (Sutrisno, 2012)
Nowadays,
there are two ways of approaching semantics. The formal semantics approach
connects with classical philosophical semantics, that is, logic. It should not
be forgotten that semantics was a part of philosophy for many centuries. Formal
semantics tries to describe the meaning of language using the descriptive apparatus
of formal logic. The goal is to describe natural language in a formal, precise,
unambiguous way. Related (though not identical) denominations for this type of
semantics are truth-conditional semantics, model-theoretic semantics, logical semantics,
etc.
The
other approach to semantics we could call psychologically-oriented semantics or
cognitive semantics. This approach does not consider the logical structure of
language as important for the description of the meaning of language, and tends
to disregard notions such as truth-values or strict compositionality. Cognitive
semantics tries to explain semantic phenomena by appealing to biological, psychological
and even cultural issues. They are less concerned with notions of reference and
try to propose explanations that will fit with everything that we know about
cognition, including perception and the role of the body in the structuring of meaning
structures.
So,
we can conclude that Semantic is the study of meaning. It is a wide subject
within the general study of language. An understanding of semantics is
essential to the study of language acquisition (how language users acquire a
sense of meaning, as speakers and writers, listeners and readers) and of
language change (how meanings alter over time). It is important for
understanding language in social contexts, as these are likely to affect
meaning, and for understanding varieties of English and effects of style. It is
thus one of the most fundamental concepts in linguistics.
- The
systematic study of meaning
Linguistic
semantics is an attempt to explicate the knowledge of any speakers of a
language which allows that speaker to communicate facts, feeling, intentions
and products of the imagination to other speakers and to understand what they
communicate to him or her.
Three
disciplines are concerned with the systematic study of ‘meaning’ in itself: psychology,
philosophy, and linguistics. Psychologists, they are interested in: how
individual human learn, how they retain, recall, or lose information; how they
classify, make judgments and solve problems. In other words, how the human mind
seeks meanings, and works with them; Philosophers of language are concerned
with how we know, how any particular fact that we know or accept as true is
related to other possible facts In other words, what must be antecedent to that
fact and what is a likely consequence, or entailment of it; what statements are
mutually contradictory, which sentences express the same meaning in different
words, and which are unrelated; Linguists want to understand how language
works. Just what common knowledge do two people posses when they share a
language that makes it possible for them to give and get information, to
express their feelings and their intentions to another, and to be understood
with a fair degree of success.
According
to Alsayed (2012) meaning covers a variety of aspects of language, and there is
no general agreement about the nature of meaning. Looking at the word itself,
the dictionary will suggest a number of different meanings of the noun
“meaning” and the verb “mean”. The word mean can be applied to people who use
language, i.e. to speakers, in the sense of “intend”. And it can be applied to
words and sentences in the sense of “be equivalent to”. To understand what
meaning is, one has to keep in mind whether we are talking about what speakers
mean or what words (or sentences) mean.
It
may seem to you that meaning is so vague, insubstantial, and elusive that it is
impossible to come to any clear, concrete, or tangible conclusions about it. We
hope to convince you that by careful thought about the language you speak and
the way it is used, definite conclusions can be arrived at concerning meaning. Lewis
Carroll had brilliant insights into the nature of meaning (and into the foibles
of people who theorize about it). In the passage above, he is playfully suggesting
that the meanings carried by words may be affected by a speaker’s will. Lewis
Carroll’s aim was to amuse, and he could afford to be enigmatic and even nonsensical.
The aim of serious semanticists is to explain and clarify the nature of
meaning. (Hurford, Heasley and Smith, 2007)
Semantics
deals with:
- Words meaning
Language
is used for communication. In communicating, speakers or writers communicate meaning
to listeners or readers. The nature of the meaning of a word is its referent. The
referent of a word can be an object, an event, a state, a process, or an action
here in this world. Word meaning can also said lexical meaning (Lyons, 1985) :
the meaning of lexemes depends upon the of sentences in which they occur. (Sutrisno, 2012)
Examples
:
- hot is : [ a state of having a high
temperature ]
- to sew is : [ an action of working with a
needle and thread
- drizzling is : [ the process of raining
in small drops ]
- a party is : [ an event of the gathering of
persons, by invitation, for pleasure ]
- Sentence
meaning
According
to Hurford, Heasley and Smith (2007), sentence meaning is what a sentence means,
i.e. what it counts as the equivalent of in the language concerned. According to Lyons,( 1985) as in Sutrisno (2012),
the meaning of sentence is the product of both lexical and grammatical meaning
(the meaning of the constituent of lexemes and of the grammatical
constructions)
Examples
:
1.
This is a beautiful garden flower
2.
This is a beautiful flower garden
In sentence (1) the focus is on flower, where
as in sentence (2) the focus is on garden. It is clear that the conceptual meaning of the sentence depends on the
reference and the structures of the words.
- Utterance
meaning
Speaker
meaning is what a speaker means (i.e. intends to convey) when he uses a piece
of language. (Hurford, Heasley and Smith, 2007), In
communication, the meaning of an utterance is not only determined by the
conceptual meaning of the sentence but also by paralinguistic features such as
stress, pitch, intonation, juncture, body movements, head movements, hand
gestures, eye-contact, and the distance between the interlocutors.
Examples
: “It’s one o’clock”, can be interpreted
as “It’s really one o’clock” or “It’s time to have lunch” or “It’s time to stop
the lecture.” So the meaning does not only depends the reference, conceptual
sentence but also context, gestures, intonations etc.
- The
definition of Sentence, Utterance
and Preposition
A
sentence is a grammatically complete string of words expressing a complete
thought. This very traditional definition is unfortunately vague, but it is
hard to arrive at a better one for our purposes. It is intended to exclude any
string of words that does not have a verb in it, as well as other string.
Utterances of non-sentences, e.g. short phrases, or single words, are used by
people in communication all the time. People do not converse wholly in (tokens
of) well formed sentences. But the abstract idea of a sentence is the basis for
understanding even those expressions which are not sentences. In the
overwhelming majority of cases, the meanings of non-sentences can best be
analyzed by considering them to be abbreviations, or incomplete versions, of
whole sentences. (Hurford, Heasley and Smith, 2007)
An
utterance is any stretch of talk, by one person, before and after which there
is silence on the part of that person. An utterance is the USE by a particular
speaker, on a particular occasion, of a piece of language, such as a sequence
of sentences, or a single phrase, or even a single word.
Utterance
may consist of a single word, a single phrase or a single sentence. They may
also consist of sequence of sentence. It is not unusual to find utterances that
consist of one or more grammatically incomplete sentence-fragments. In short,
there is no simple relation of correspondence between utterances and sentences.
Utterances are physical events. Events are ephemeral. Utterances die on the
wind. Linguistics deals with spoken language and we will have a lot to say
about utterances in this book. But we will concentrate even more on another
notion, that of sentences.
A
sentence is neither a physical event nor a physical object. It is conceived
abstractly a string of words put together by the grammatical rules of a
language. A sentence can be thought of as the ideal string of words behind
various realizations in utterances and inscriptions. We have defined a sentence
as a string of words. A given sentence always consists of the same words, and
in the same order. Any change in the words or in their order makes a different
sentence for our purposes.
It
would make sense to say that an utterance was in a particular accent (i.e. a
particular way of pronouncing words). However, it would not make strict sense
to say that a sentence was in a particular accent, because a sentence itself is
only associated with phonetic characteristics such as accent and voice quality
through a speaker’s act of uttering it. Accent and voice quality belong
strictly to the utterance, not to the sentence uttered. Not all utterances are
actually tokens of sentences, but sometimes only of parts of sentences, e.g.
phrases or single words.
A
proposition is that part of the meaning of the utterance of a declarative
sentence which describes some state of affairs. The state of affairs typically
involves persons or things referred to by expressions in the sentence and the
situation or action they are involved in. In uttering a declarative sentence a
speaker typically asserts a proposition. In our definition of ‘proposition’ we
explicitly mentioned declarative sentences, but propositions are clearly in the
meanings of other types of sentences, such as interrogatives, which are used to
ask questions, and imperatives, which are used to convey orders. Normally, when
a speaker utters a simple declarative sentence, he commits himself to the truth
of the corresponding proposition: i.e. he asserts the proposition. By uttering
a simple interrogative or imperative, a speaker can mention a particular
proposition, without asserting its truth.
We shall have a lot to say in later units
about utterances, sentences and propositions, since these concepts are at the
bottom of all talk about meaning. We shall see that we have to be very careful,
when talking about meaning, to make it clear whether we are dealing with
utterances or sentences. To this end we shall try summarizing the relationship
between these notions.
We
shall use the term of ‘proposition’, ‘sentence’, and ‘utterance’ inn such a way
that anything that can be said of propositions can also be said of sentences
can also be said of utterances, but not necessarily vice versa. We have already
seen an example of this when we said it was sensible to talk of sentence being
in a particular language, and also sensible top talk of an utterance being in a
particular language, although one cannot talk of proposition being in a
particular language.
A
proposition is an abstraction that can be grasped by the mind of an individual
person. In this sense, a proposition is an object of thought. Do not equate
propositions with thoughts, because thoughts are usually held to be private,
personal, mental processes, whereas propositions are public in the sense that
the same proposition is accessible to different persons: different individuals
can grasp the same proposition. Furthermore, a proposition is not a process,
whereas a thought can be seen as process going on in an individual’s mind.
Unfortunately, of course the word thought may sometimes be used loosely in a
way which includes the notion of a proposition. For the instance, one may say,
‘The same thought came into both our heads at the same time’. In this case, the
word thought is being used in a sense quite like that of the word proposition.
The relationship between mental processes (e.g. thoughts), abstract semantic
entities (e.g. proposition), linguistic entities (e.g. sentences) and action
(e.g. utterances) is problematic and complicated, and we will not go into the
differences further here. (Hurford, Heasley and Smith, 2007)
- The
definition of Reference and Sense
Sense
and reference are two very distinct ways of talking about the meaning of words
and other expressions. Sense deals with the relationships inside the language. The
sense of an expression is its place in a system of semantic relationships with
other expressions in the language.
Examples
:
- The
relationship between “big” and “small” is oppositeness of meaning (antonymy).
- The relationship between “rich” and
“wealthy” is sameness of meaning (synonymy). We will talk more about sense
relations in a coming lecture. In some cases, the same word-form can have more
than one sense.
- Look at the word-form “bank” in the
following sentences:
“I
have an account at the bank.”
“We
took the boat to the other bank of the river.”
In
these examples, “bank” has a different sense in each sentence.
Reference
is a relationship between parts of a language (words and phrases) and things
outside the language (in the world). By reference a speaker indicates which
things and persons in the world are being talked about. E.g. My son is in the
house. “My son” here refers to a person in the world and “the house” refers to
a thing in the world.
To
make the term reference clearer to you, hold a book in your hand and describe
it in a sentence. For example: “This book is about Semantics.”
The
English expression “this book” is part of the language. This expression can
refer to any book. In the example, we used it to refer to part of the world
which is the book you are holding in your hand. “Reference” is the relationship
between the language expression and the real world object.
CONCLUSION
Semantics
is a branch of linguistics dealing with the meaning of words, phrases and
sentences, however, contrary to pragmatics it does not analyze the intended
speaker meaning, or what words denote on a given occasion, but the objective,
conventional meaning.
A
sentence is a group of words that are put together to mean something. A
sentence is the basic unit of language which expresses a complete thought. It
does this by following the grammatical rules of syntax. An Utterance is any
sound of talk, that human produce. To differentiate utterance and sentence, we
usually use quotation mark (“….“) in written form of utterance. A Proposition
is that part of the meaning of the utterance of a declarative sentence which
describes some state of affairs. Besides declarative sentence, proposition also
clearly involved in the meaning of interrogatives and imperative sentences.
Reference
is relation between piece of language and the things in the world. A referent
is concrete object or concept that is designated by a word or expression. Sense
: its place in a system of semantic relationships with other expressions in the
language. Sense consists of 'semantic properties'.